Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 247(14): 1253-1263, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1820101

ABSTRACT

Epidemiological data across the United States show health disparities in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality by race/ethnicity. While the association between elevated SARS-CoV-2 viral loads (VLs) (i.e. upper respiratory tract (URT) and peripheral blood (PB)) and increased COVID-19 severity has been reported, data remain largely unavailable for some disproportionately impacted racial/ethnic groups, particularly for American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. As such, we determined the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 VL dynamics and disease severity in a diverse cohort of hospitalized patients. Results presented here are for study participants (n = 94, ages 21-88 years) enrolled in a prospective observational study between May and October 2020 who had SARS-CoV-2 viral clades 20A, C, and G. Based on self-reported race/ethnicity and sample size distribution, the cohort was stratified into two groups: (AI/AN, n = 43) and all other races/ethnicities combined (non-AI/AN, n = 51). SARS-CoV-2 VLs were quantified in the URT and PB on days 0-3, 6, 9, and 14. The strongest predictor of severe COVID-19 in the study population was the mean VL in PB (OR = 3.34; P = 2.00 × 10-4). The AI/AN group had the following: (1) comparable co-morbidities and admission laboratory values, yet more severe COVID-19 (OR = 4.81; P = 0.014); (2) a 2.1 longer duration of hospital stay (P = 0.023); and (3) higher initial and cumulative PB VLs during severe disease (P = 0.025). Moreover, self-reported race/ethnicity as AI/AN was the strongest predictor of elevated PB VLs (ß = 1.08; P = 6.00 × 10-4) and detection of SARS-CoV-2 in PB (hazard ratio = 3.58; P = 0.004). The findings presented here suggest a strong relationship between PB VL (magnitude and frequency) and severe COVID-19, particularly for the AI/AN group.


Subject(s)
Alaskan Natives , COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Ethnicity , Humans , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 246(18): 2039-2045, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1295377

ABSTRACT

As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has surged across the globe, great effort has been expended to understand mechanisms of transmission and spread. From a hospital perspective, this topic is critical to limit and prevent SARS-CoV-2 iatrogenic transmission within the healthcare environment. Currently, the virus is believed to be transmitted primarily through respiratory droplets, but a growing body of evidence suggests that spread is also possible through aerosolized particles and fomites. Amidst a growing volume of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for SARS-CoV-2 transmission through fomites. Samples collected from the exposed skin of clinicians (n = 42) and high-touch surfaces (n = 40) were collected before and after encounters with COVID-19 patients. Samples were analyzed using two assays: the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time Reverse Transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay, and a SYBR Green assay that targeted a 121 bp region within the S-gene of SARS-CoV-2. None of the samples tested positive with the CDC assay, while two high-touch surface areas tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using the Spike assay. However, viral culture did not reveal viable SARS-CoV-2 from the positive samples. Overall, the results from this study suggest that SARS-CoV-2 RNA were not widely present either on exposed skin flora or high-touch surface areas in the hospital locations tested. The inability to recover viable virus from samples that tested positive by the molecular assays, however, does not rule out the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through fomites.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Fomites/virology , Health Planning , Hospitals, University , Pandemics , COVID-19/virology , Health Personnel , Humans , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Specimen Handling , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Touch
3.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 246(8): 952-959, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-992323

ABSTRACT

The ongoing pandemic of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has placed a substantial strain on the supply of personal protective equipment, particularly the availability of N95 respirators for frontline healthcare personnel. These shortages have led to the creation of protocols to disinfect and reuse potentially contaminated personal protective equipment. A simple and inexpensive decontamination procedure that does not rely on the use of consumable supplies is dry heat incubation. Although reprocessing with this method has been shown to maintain the integrity of N95 respirators after multiple decontamination procedures, information on the ability of dry heat incubation to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 is largely unreported. Here, we show that dry heat incubation does not consistently inactivate SARS-CoV-2-contaminated N95 respirators, and that variation in experimental conditions can dramatically affect viability of the virus. Furthermore, we show that SARS-CoV-2 can survive on N95 respirators that remain at room temperature for at least five days. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that dry heat incubation procedures and ambient temperature for five days are not viable methods for inactivating SARS-CoV-2 on N95 respirators for potential reuse. We recommend that decontamination procedures being considered for the reuse of N95 respirators be validated at each individual site and that validation of the process must be thoroughly conducted using a defined protocol.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hot Temperature , Masks , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Virus Inactivation , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Chlorocebus aethiops , Humans , Vero Cells
4.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 246(6): 740-748, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-978883

ABSTRACT

Shortages of N95 respirators for use by medical personnel have driven consideration of novel conservation strategies, including decontamination for reuse and extended use. Decontamination methods listed as promising by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (vaporous hydrogen peroxide (VHP), wet heat, ultraviolet irradiation (UVI)) and several methods considered for low resource environments (bleach, isopropyl alcohol and detergent/soap) were studied for two commonly used surgical N95 respirators (3M™ 1860 and 1870+ Aura™). Although N95 filtration performance depends on the electrostatically charged electret filtration layer, the impact of decontamination on this layer is largely unexplored. As such, respirator performance following decontamination was assessed based on the fit, filtration efficiency, and pressure drop, along with the relationship between (1) surface charge of the electret layer, and (2) elastic properties of the straps. Decontamination with VHP, wet heat, UVI, and bleach did not degrade fit and filtration performance or electret charge. Isopropyl alcohol and soap significantly degraded fit, filtration performance, and electret charge. Pressure drop across the respirators was unchanged. Modest degradation of N95 strap elasticity was observed in mechanical fatigue testing, a model for repeated donnings and doffings. CDC recommended decontamination methods including VHP, wet heat, and UV light did not degrade N95 respirator fit or filtration performance in these tests. Extended use of N95 respirators may degrade strap elasticity, but a loss of face seal integrity should be apparent during user seal checks. NIOSH recommends performing user seal checks after every donning to detect loss of appropriate fit. Decontamination methods which degrade electret charge such as alcohols or detergents should not be used on N95 respirators. The loss of N95 performance due to electret degradation would not be apparent to a respirator user or evident during a negative pressure user seal check.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Decontamination/methods , N95 Respirators/supply & distribution , 2-Propanol/pharmacology , Detergents/pharmacology , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Static Electricity , Ultraviolet Rays
5.
J Infect Dis ; 222(10): 1620-1628, 2020 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-863292

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma (CP) is a potentially important therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, knowledge regarding neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers in donor plasma and their impact in patients with acute COVID-19 remains largely undetermined. We measured NAb titers in CP and in patients with acute COVID-19 before and after transfusion through the traditional Food and Drug Administration investigational new drug pathway. METHODS: We performed a single-arm interventional trial measuring NAb and total antibody titers before and after CP transfusion over a 14-day period in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. RESULTS: NAb titers in the donor CP units were low (<1:40 to 1:160) and had no effect on recipient neutralizing activity 1 day after transfusion. NAb titers were detected in 6 of 12 patients on enrollment and in 11 of 12 at ≥2 time points. Average titers peaked on day 7 and declined toward day 14 (P = .004). Nab titers and immunoglobulin G levels were correlated in donor plasma units (ρ = 0.938; P < .001) and in the cumulative patient measures (ρ = 0.781; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CP infusion did not alter recipient NAb titers. Prescreening of CP may be necessary for selecting donors with high titers of neutralizing activity for infusion into patients with COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04434131.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Blood Donors , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/genetics , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Middle Aged , New Mexico/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Serotherapy
6.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 245(11): 933-939, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-245432

ABSTRACT

IMPACT STATEMENT: There is a critical shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) around the globe. This article describes the safe collection, storage, and decontamination of N95 respirators using hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV). This article is unique because it describes the HPV process in an operating room, and is therefore, a deployable method for many healthcare settings. Results presented here offer creative solutions to the current PPE shortage.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Decontamination/methods , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Masks/virology , Respiratory Protective Devices/virology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL